The Red Pill and Defense Mechanisms

defenseWhen I was writing the recent article about the lamentations of “Fun Single girl, one of the things that struck me was how many of her complaints, men being raised poorly, men not embodying the narrative of what a man should be and men not knowing what they want, so accurately appear to capture the negative phenomena. Some of the more frequent complaints I see in the manosphere both in articles and comment sections is that women are no longer raised to be feminine, to embody the image of what a female is and that women do not know what they want. This made me think of the mechanism of psychological projection, wherein a human being defends themselves against unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves and attributing them to others. Perhaps the woman in lamentations is in fact attributing the truth about herself to the men she desires but fails to capture in her net.

This lead to thinking about the psychological defense mechanisms that Sigmund Freud identified, and that Anna Freud defined in “The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense“. These are not merely unconscious protective measures to stop you from connecting with your instincts, but also serve to protect you from the consequences of confronting your flaws and weaknesses. Thus, by identifying when defense mechanisms appear in your psyche, you can better connect with your instincts, confront your flaws, and eradicate your weaknesses. There is quite an arsenal of different defense mechanisms, but for the purpose of brevity, I’ll cover the nine most common ones.

Defense Mechanisms

All the defense mechanisms share a common goal, to protect your ego. While the manifestation of many of them appear similar in manifestation, they are in fact different phenomena with different consequences. One should seek to identify these in oneself in order to grow as a person. Even the “best” defense mechanism, that involves channeling negative emotions into productive outlets, ultimately denies you growth on an emotional level. One can frequently see this in people who engage in vigorous bouts of self-improvement and self-development, only to find themselves not realizing their desired outcome.

All defense mechanisms tend to negatively influence your life, as they prevent you from confronting reality, however some are more productive than others. For instance sublimation (channeling negative emotions into positive action) is better than sitting down with your fingers in your ears going “nananana“, as with denial.


This is in many ways the generic mechanism as it serves as the foundation for many others. This mechanism is in use when a person refuses to see the truth of fact, or reality. While this may be a normal reaction to trauma, it also surfaces in many other situations. One of the better examples would be what was themed quantum state feminists by Milo Yiannopoulos, in that they provoke a response, only to claim to be the victim. In a sense, they are in denial of their own role in the situation.

With male and female relationships denial plays a somewhat unique role relating to female solipsism, where it appears that denial is a cornerstone of the female psyche, both in terms of loyalty and wrongdoing, but also in terms of being capable of disregarding large arsenals of fact in favor of anecdotal evidence.


The form of this function is one step beyond denial, where a person actually forgets unpleasant experiences in the past, or forgets to do something they find unpleasant such as visiting a dentist. People rarely forget those things that they enjoy or desire, but are prone to forget those which they do not. This reflects back to an old adage about weight training, “Do the lifts you hate”, people rarely forget to go to the gym on chest day, but frequently do so on leg day.


A person utilizing regression reverts back to a child-like emotional state where unconscious fears, anxieties and general angst reappears. A person generally regresses when put under conditions of stress. A person who regresses to the oral stage for instance, may become verbally aggressive. A person regressing to the anal stage may become messy or overly tidy. Freud’s original concept of psycho-sexual development centers on fixations developing at various stages. A fixation developing at the oral stage would according to Freud lead to an individual that has problems with dependency or aggression. If a fixation occurs at the anal stage, this manifests in a person either being messy, wasteful or destructive or alternatively, stringent, rigid and obsessive.


The defense mechanism known as displacement is when feelings that would get you in trouble are transferred from the target to a more harmless target. For instance, a husband may be angry at his wife, but instead takes it out on his employees. Feelings of lust towards an employee may be displaced to the wife. In essence, this is a simple case of moving feelings from one target to another.  A person may also transfer anger at another into anger directed at themselves, which then manifests as self-destructive behavior.


Projection, the mechanism that started this essay, is one in which a person “projects” less desirable qualities, desires or onto someone else. We saw this illustrated in the lamentations of fun single girl, in that many of the things she mentioned about men such as them not knowing what they want, and avoiding settling down, are frequently the actions that land women in “fun, single land” at 30 years old or older.

Reaction formation

This is when a person pulls a reversal on what they are actually feeling. Lets say that you harbor lustful feelings towards a co-worker, but you cannot act on them, as dipping your pen in company ink is a recipe for disaster. So instead of expressing your feelings of lust, you express the exact opposite. Quite common among men, especially those who have not implemented red pill philosophy, it defends the integrity of the psyche by preemptively rejecting the female through opposite behavior.


The mechanism of intellectualization is when rather than confront the emotional fallout and consequences of events, one instead approaches it from an intellectual perspective. Men appear more prone to this defense mechanism, and one of the better examples is the manner in which many women try to persuade their boyfriends to move in with them. “It makes so much sense financially, there is no point in paying for 2 appartements right?” or “We spend most of the time at my place anyway, so it would save so much time instead of running between our places“. Rather than challenge why every fiber of their being is fighting against moving in together, these guys think “I can’t disagree with the logic“.


Rationalization is simply a case of explaining away a situation. Where a person engaging in intellectualization converts painful or negative emotions into neutral thoughts, a person engaging in rationalization deals with the behavior or emotions through explaining them in some way. My favorite example of this mechanism in women, is from the movie “Clerks” where the following conversation takes place between the main character (Dante) and his girlfriend, Veronica [1]:

Dante: You sucked that guy’s dick!?

Veronica: Yeah, how do you think I knew that he…

Dante: Wait, but you said you only had sex with three different guys! You never mentioned him.

Veronica: Because I never had sex with him.

Dante: You sucked his dick!

Veronica: We went out a few times. We never had sex, but we fooled around.

Dante: Oh, my God! Why did you tell me you only had sex with three different guys?

Veronica: Because I did only have sex with three different guys! That doesn’t mean I didn’t just go with people.

Dante: Oh, my God, I feel so nauseous.

Veronica: Sorry, Dante, I thought you understood.

Dante: I did understand! I understood that you had sex with three different guys and that’s all you said!

Veronica: Please calm down.

Dante: How many?

Veronica: Dante!

Dante: How many dicks have you sucked?

Veronica: Let it go!

Dante: How many?

Veronica: All right! Shut up a second and I’ll tell you! Jesus! I didn’t freak out like this when you told me how many girls you fucked!

Dante: This is different! This is important! How many? [A customer comes up to the counter and Dante helps her while Veronica does some math] Well?

Veronica: Um… something like 36.


Veronica: Lower your voice.

Dante: Wait, what is that anyway, “something like 36?” Does that include me?

Veronica: Um… 37.

The conversation above is what if often referred to as the “rationalization hamster” within the manosphere. Where a woman who sleeps with a man will rationalize away guilt, shame or the fact that she has a boyfriend, with “it just happened“. Some of the early pick-up material was built around feeding the hamster and giving a woman what would sound as credible excuses when she explains to her friends what happened.


The 9th and final defense mechanism covered in this essay, sublimation is when a person takes negative emotions and converts them into productive outlets. For instance, a man who takes his negative emotions about his self-worth and converts it into ambition and accomplishments. In many ways, sublimation is the primary defense mechanism advocated by most self-development authors both within and outside of the manosphere. Where the “always be improving” mantra advocates utilizing negative emotions and pushing yourself into a non-stop hamster wheel of self-improvement.

Summary and Conclusions

The defense mechanisms in themselves form a framework through which you can analyze your reactions to stress. While sublimation is most likely the most productive one, it is no more productive than identifying the reason for why you are utilizing it. You may find yourself a few years down the road, having made great progress, yet facing the exact same issues. The ability to identify defense mechanisms at work in other people, also lets you know that you are pressing on a sore spot, and thus, informs future actions.

Perhaps one of the more known uses of defense mechanisms in the sphere is relating to the so called “Purple Pill“, which can be argued as a mixture of denial and rationalization, wherein a person who is fully aware of red pill truths, will deny or rationalize them away to save themselves the struggle and pain involved with letting go of the blue pill fantasy. This is quite common among men who find the sphere because they are hopelessly in love with their unicorn, and seek to deductively solve their problem. They arrive in the sphere, learn game, and occasionally the principles that serve as its foundation. They utilize these methods in order to get their oneitis, then immediately revert back to the blue pill theoretical framework only to find themselves in the sphere yet again, this time lamenting the loss of their “perfect woman“, and asking how to win her back.

When Neil Strauss tells the story of Mystery and his oneitis in “The Game”, what he outlines is the breakdown of Mystery’s intellectualization of the human mating process. Mystery devised a system that predictably and reliably allowed him to sleep with beautiful women, however when he sought to bridge this into a long-term relationship with a woman with whom he was in love, the intellectualization cracked. He was no longer able to view the interactions through a purely intellectual lens, due to the strength of the emotions he was feeling. When we speak of congruence, we are speaking of to what extent a person’s external manifestation reflects their inner reality.

For instance, is the man who appears confident, well put together, great looking, in great shape, with all the trappings of wealth and style truly this person, or is this merely a image he projects into the world, to cover the opposite? Female’s shit test for this exact reason, to see whether the inside matches the outside.

A note:

I recently launched a Patreon page where I will be posting additional content every month for those who support me and I will do a Google Hangout for the highest tier Patrons (limited to 10 people).

I’ve also had some requests for consults, which I’ve declined up until now, but due to demand I’ve chosen to open up for doing some consults on request. For details please check out my Consulting and Patreon Page

As always you can buy my book Gendernomics at as both paperback and Kindle

More Reading:

Why Do I Do That?: Psychological Defense Mechanisms and the Hidden Ways They Shape Our Lives by Joseph Burgo



16 comments on “The Red Pill and Defense Mechanisms

  1. UB says:

    Nowadays, with the “empowered woman” movement, is there any reason to really chase women? Most of them are current whores or future whores. Even worse, if you get fooled and go into marriage with one and then you divorce, you risk having a parasite for life.

    In my opinion, if you need sex, hire a hooker. If you need companionship, make male friends and also buy a dog. If you need to be “mothered”, keep living with you mom.

    I don’t personally see why would you even engage in a relationship with a women these days.


    • Any such reason must be determined by each individual. The deal has become substantially worse for men as the century progressed, and shows little sign of improving. However, the value on which a man places on his time, and thus how much of it he is willing to spend chasing women is up to him.


  2. superslaviswife says:

    The proof is in the pudding: when a person has what they desire and is satisfied, then they’re doing well. When their failings eat them up and make them bitter towards others’ successes, then they are not addressing their true flaws and desires. The oil millionaire with great looks and an impressive harem might still be dissatisfied because what he actually wanted was to play piano and have a son. But for whatever reason he uses his defense mechanisms to hide from this.

    I come from very little and don’t have a lot compared to many of the people I associate with. But everything I have gives me joy and I’m satisfied. I realized very early on that I had to chase what I wanted regardless of what others said. I did so. And that fed success. I could have finished my degree, for instance. But it was a genuine torment to me. I could have waited until I was “old enough” to date. But then I wouldn’t have had Jon. I could have got a “proper” job. But then I’d be stuck in a 9-5 making the same money I now make from home.

    And from that satisfaction comes peace of mind. Although other people’s choices confuse me, when they seem genuinely happy it doesn’t bother me what they do. Our closest friends are nothing like Jon and I and we get along great. I got mine, they got theirs, we’re all good. On the flip side, some relatives apparently aspire to our same ideals, try and live as we do, and yet I can’t stand them because they’re constantly moping about people like our friends. They can’t believe that people like our friends live as they do and are happy. They deny that a life different to theirs is satisfying… whilst often secretively trying to emulate that life.

    At the same time, they get hostile when they find out that people living the same life as they are can be free of their headaches. They need you to commiserate with them and agree that their choices are terrible, as though sharing some martyrdom. When their pursuits fail them, they then assume these failures are common to everyone who shares their pursuit, rather than the result of chasing something they only half-heartedly wanted. For instance they believe and embrace that sex lives need to go stale, or money needs to cause fights. They turn their noses up at our friends who have threesomes to rev things up and who keep finances split and spend frivolously. But they’re just as hateful towards a married couple who still enjoys a passionate sex life and who can live on an income below theirs. I don’t care how they live their lives, but their constant unhappiness winds me up. So instead I associate with people whose lives are completely the opposite of mine. Because they’re happy. When people avoid and deny what they want, they’re just constantly seething and sneering at EVERYTHING.

    Wealth isn’t hollow. Looks aren’t shallow. Sex isn’t empty. Fun isn’t callous. Marriage isn’t boring. Power isn’t senseless. Fame isn’t torture. Children aren’t a drain. Careers aren’t soul-sucking. But for the person who chases any of the former simply to avoid chasing what they actually want, they all could seem that way.


    • Defense mechanisms kick in when you are not being in-congruent with who you really are and what you desire. When you appropriate the goals of others, desires of others, and act in accordance with that, rather than your own goals, desires and wanted outcomes, your defense mechanisms will be running on high gear.

      Liked by 1 person

      • superslaviswife says:

        Absolutely. I think a big part of it is being in denial about what can cause denial. Many people seem to think the only causes for denial are self-destructive addictive habits. You could be in denial about being an alcoholic, but not about childhood aspiration or your favourite pudding. In reality, people deny all aspects of their identity and desires as long as the reality is a little more stressful than the ideal. You can easily be in denial about how much you like cheese, just because accepting the reality means you need to do a few minutes extra work a day, for instance restricting cheese intake or adjusting your lifestyle to eat more cheese. If anything, humans “defend” ourselves against minor stressors far more violently than we do against major life aspects. Unsure if this is a byproduct of consumerism and everything becoming a product, or whether the constant stream of advertising and consumption just makes it obvious how badly we deal with stress.

        Adopting the goals and desires of others, both big and small, makes all these decisions and all this work easier and less stressful. If we buy the same shoes as the celebs, get into the family business, follow the approved relationship pattern, and eat local convenience food, then we avoid stressors and don’t need to change our lives. But if these things do not match our own goals and desires, then denial is easier than actually pursuing what we want.


      • I agree, people tend to attribute reactions such as denial or repression to the “big issues” rather than accepting that it can apply to any issue, regardless of how minute. Sugar consumption for instance is a common thing people are in denial of “I don’t eat that many sweets”, as you watch them go through bowl after bowl of various sugary treats.

        The ultimate thing with goals and desires is that every social group we interact with influences our super-ego, and has an agenda for the desires and goals they seek to program into us. Society seeks to program in that you should be a 40 – 60 hour a week productive corporate drone, that follows the law to the letter, because this is the best possible outcome from society.

        Liked by 1 person

      • superslaviswife says:

        Some really bad reality TV is, oddly enough, a beautiful example of people in denial. “Secret Eaters”, “Snog, Marry, Avoid”, “The Bachelor”, “Cesar 911”, “Supernanny”, etc. Not at all productive. But watching one episode of each is enough to show you how most people rationalize their choices, and even their denial, away. After the first one every episode is the same, though.


  3. Grant says:

    Out of intellectual curiosity, is this influenced by The Last Psychiatrist? He wrote a lot of good stuff about projection. Either way, I think any red pill person needs to be aware of image projection and defense mechanisms. Good read.


    • No, it was not. I’m not familiar with the last psychiatrist. This came about as a thought-experiment of sorts following the article I wrote called “Lamentations of Fun, Single Girl in The City” that was inspired by a post I was linked by someone on Twitter. What/Who is the last psychiatrist?


  4. Antonio says:

    “For instance, is the man who appears confident, well put together, great looking, in great shape, with all the trappings of wealth and style truly this person, or is this merely a image he projects into the world, to cover the opposite? Female’s shit test for this exact reason, to see whether the inside matches the outside. ”

    Best explanation of shit tests i ever read. Thanks a lot. I was thinking of shit tests as evil and now i can sleep better and just try to pass them…thanks again.


  5. […] wiped clean of all aspects of the red pill. It may be suppressed for a time, or channeled through a defense mechanism or two, but the idealism that is required for a true blue pill fantasy is gone and what remains is merely […]


  6. […] human beings is the tendency to default to standard programming. I touched on this in an earlier in defense mechanisms, on how we revert to earlier behavior when under stress. However, it appears very difficult to […]


  7. […] your behavior in a negative or positive fashion for decades. Some learn ineffective use of defense mechanisms, others self-sabotage, accept mediocrity, and never challenge themselves to go beyond their comfort […]


  8. […] cost. He keeps kneading it over and over in his head, and instead of being angry with himself, and sublimating this anger into the very accomplishments that will increase his value, weight lifting, dressing […]


  9. […] incapable of moving beyond the anger phase and simply remain there, utilizing a wide range of defense mechanisms to avoid having to deal with the […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.